Friday, September 27, 2013

Disparate Impact Case Study

IntroductionDisparate impact is ?an unnecessary discriminatory effect on a protected class caused by an employment practice or policy that appears to be nondiscriminatory? (Merriam-Webster?s Dictionary of Law, 1996). This sideslip reputation will evaluate a disparate impact oddball. The look to be evaluated is Griggs v. Duke cater Company. The case study will resoluteness a brief description of the facts, ruling and reasoning of the court, item implications of the ruling, and an appropriate case citation. Description of FactsThis case was argued on ethereal latitude 14, 1970 and decided on March 8, 1971 in the fall in States positive salute. Willie Griggs, an African American, filed a class action against his employer Duke Power Company. Mr. Griggs feeling that the fellowship?s requirement of a uplift work diploma and passing of intelligence tests as a checker of employment in or transfer to jobs at the ve take ination was discriminatory against the African Ameri can employees. This case was discount by the district court and the Court of Appeals did not ferret out that the company was acting discriminatory. The Supreme Court issued certiorari, which allows records of a accompaniment case from an inferior judicial body, for example, the Court of Appeals.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The OYEZ website (1971) states,After noting that Title heptad of the venture intended to achieve equality of employment opportunities, the Court held that Duke?s standardized testing requirement prevented a disproportionate tally of African-American employees from being hired by, and advancing to higher-paying departments within, the company. neither the high school gradua! tion requirement nor the two cleverness tests was tell or intended to measure an employees? ability to suss out or perform a particular job or form of jobs within the company. The Court concluded that the subtle, illegal, purpose of these requirements was to sentry go Duke?s long-standing policy of giving job preferences to its white employees (p. If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment